{"id":850,"date":"2011-01-14T14:34:33","date_gmt":"2011-01-14T19:34:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.berjournal.com\/?p=850"},"modified":"2011-05-18T15:57:03","modified_gmt":"2011-05-18T20:57:03","slug":"neo-mercantilist-policies-during-the-process-of-world-agricultural-trade-liberalization","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.berjournal.com\/tr\/neo-mercantilist-policies-during-the-process-of-world-agricultural-trade-liberalization","title":{"rendered":"Neo-Mercantilist Policies During the Process of World Agricultural Trade Liberalization"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n<\/col>\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Article Information<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Journal: <\/strong><\/span>Business and Economics Research Journal<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Title of Article: <\/strong><\/span>D\u00fcnya Tar\u0131m Ticareti Serbestle\u015fme S\u00fcrecinde Neo-Merkantilist Politikalar<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

[<\/span><\/span>Neo-Mercantilist Policies During the Process of World Agricultural Trade Liberalization<\/span>] <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Author(s):<\/strong><\/span> <\/span>Ahmet Emre Biber<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Volume:<\/strong><\/span> 2<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Number:<\/strong><\/span> 1<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Year:<\/strong><\/span> 2011<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Page: <\/strong><\/span>31 – 52<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

ISSN: <\/strong><\/span>1309-2448<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Abstract<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

The main argument of the article; <\/span><\/span><\/span>protection policies <\/span><\/span><\/span>were applied in foreign trade during the various period of 17th century to 20th century such as high customs tariffs, export restrictions and non-tariff barriers, that still defended and <\/span><\/span><\/span>widely <\/span><\/span><\/span>applied in agricultural trade by developed countries.<\/span><\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/span><\/span>In this context, the study will be put forward in terms of causes and consequences, known as the neo-mercantilist policies in the process of liberalization of world trade after the second world war.<\/span><\/span><\/span> Another argument discussed in this study, po<\/span><\/span><\/span>licies that implemented in terms of world agricultural trade causes of unequal trade relations between developed and underdeveloped countries.<\/span><\/span><\/span> The reason is that<\/span><\/span><\/span>,<\/span><\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/span><\/span>these policies generally constitute for the interests of developed countries. Therefore, gradually increasing hegemonic power of the developed countries in the world agricultural markets, <\/span><\/span><\/span>affect negatively<\/span><\/span><\/span> commercial interests of underdeveloped countries<\/span><\/span><\/span>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Keywords: <\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/span>Agricultural policies, Agricultural <\/span><\/span><\/span>foreign <\/span><\/span><\/span>trade, Liberalization process, Protectionism, GATT negotiations<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

JEL Classification: <\/strong><\/span><\/span>Q17, Q18<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\r\n \r\n
\r\n \"https:\/\/www.berjournal.com\/tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/icons\/pdf.gif\"\r\n <\/td>\r\n \r\n \r\nTam Metin\r\n<\/b> ( \u2193<\/span> 4217)<\/a> <\/td>\r\n <\/tr>\r\n<\/table><\/span><\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/path><\/svg><\/i> \"Loading\"<\/p>\n

<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Article Information Journal: Business and Economics Research Journal Title of Article: D\u00fcnya Tar\u0131m Ticareti Serbestle\u015fme S\u00fcrecinde Neo-Merkantilist Politikalar [Neo-Mercantilist Policies During the Process of World Agricultural Trade Liberalization] Author(s): Ahmet Emre Biber Volume: 2 Number: 1 Year: 2011 Page: 31 – 52 ISSN: 1309-2448 Abstract The main argument of the article; protection policies were applied […]<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/path><\/svg><\/i> \"Loading\"<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-850","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-manuscript","category-manuscript2"],"a3_pvc":{"activated":true,"total_views":97,"today_views":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.berjournal.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/850","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.berjournal.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.berjournal.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.berjournal.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.berjournal.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=850"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.berjournal.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/850\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.berjournal.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=850"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.berjournal.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=850"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.berjournal.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=850"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}